The Effect of Individual Characteristics and Characteristics of Jobs on Employee Performance at Three Private Universities (Pts) In Denpasar
- Articles
- Submited: October 30, 2019
-
Published: May 30, 2019
Abstract
The title of this study is "The Effect of Individual Characteristics and Job Characteristics on Employee Performance at Three PTS in Denpasar". The purpose of this study was to analyze the simultaneous significant influence between individual characteristics and job characteristics on employee performance at Three PTS in Denpasar, to analyze partially significant influence between individual characteristics and job characteristics on employee performance at Three PTS in Denpasar, to find out Which variable is dominant between individual characteristics and job characteristics to improve employee performance at Three PTS in Denpasar. Data analysis techniques used were quantitative data analysis, classic assumption test, multiple linear regression analysis, F-test, regression coefficient t-test, beta coefficient analysis and qualitative analysis collected by observation, interview, questionnaire and documentation study techniques. From the results of the analysis obtained the following results: From the results of the F statistical test it is known that Fcount (73.925)> Ftable (3.28) with a significance value of F is 0,000 <0,05, then H0 is rejected. This means that the Individual Characteristics variable (X1) and Job Characteristics variable (X2) have a simultaneous and significant positive effect on employee performance (Y) on the Three PTS in Denpasar. Individual Characteristics and Job Characteristics are known to have a significant positive effect partially on employee performance at Three PTS in Denpasar. This is obtained through the results of the t test of the Individual Characteristics variable (X1) on employee performance (Y) where thitung (7.238) > t table (2,034) with a significance level of 0.009 <0.05, so H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted which means that the Characteristic variable Individual positive and significant effect on employee performance β1 regression coefficient (Individual Characteristic variable) of 0.580, indicating that the increase in Individual Characteristics will increase the value of employee performance in Three PTS in Denpasar. The results of t test Job Characteristics variable (X2) on employee performance (Y) is t hitung (6.040) > t table (2.034) with a significance level of 0.000 <0.05, so H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted which means that Job Characteristics variables have a positive and significant effect on employee performance β2 regression coefficient (Job Characteristics variable) of 0.696, indicating that the increase in Job Characteristics will increase performance employees at Three PTS in Denpasar. Job Characteristics have a greater value than Individual Characteristics with a regression coefficient of 0.696. Then it can be concluded that Job Characteristics are variables that have a dominant influence on employee performance at Three PTS in Denpasar.
Article Metrics Graph
References
2. As’ad, M. 2004. Seri Ilmu Sumber Daya Manusia - Psikologi Industri. Yogyakarta: Liberty
3. Ayu Putu Widani Sugianingrat, I., Rini Widyawati, S., Alexandra de Jesus da Costa, C., Ximenes, M., Dos Reis Piedade, S. and Gede Sarmawa, W., 2019. The employee engagement and OCB as mediating on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(2), pp.319-339.
4. Dessler 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Kesepuluh Jilid 2. Jakarta : PT. Indeks.
5. Dharma, A. 2001. Pengukuran Kinerja Karyawan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Flippo,
6. Edwin, B. 2005. Manajemen Personalia. Jakarta : Erlangga.
7. Gitosudarmo, I. and Sudita, I N. 2008. Perilaku Keorganisasian. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
8. Griffin. 2004. Komitmen Organisasi. Jakarta : Erlangga.
9. Gunastra, N, M. 2009. Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu, Karakteristik Pekerjaan dan Karakteristik Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Forum Manajemen. Vol.7.
10. Hackman.R.J. and Oldham.R.G. 1980. Work Redesign. Wesley Publishing Company,Inc.
11. Hall, H., Duglas T. and Goodale, J.G. 1986. Human Resource Management: Strategy, Design, and Implementation. Illinois: Scoot, Foresman and Company.
12. Hamzah 2009. Teori Motivasi dan pengukurannya. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara.
13. Handoko, T.H. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta : Penerbit BPFE.
14. Hariandja, T.E. 2002. Manajemn Sumberdaya Manusia. Jakarta: Grasindo.
15. Hazem, K. and Sarhan. 2013. Effect of Job Characteristic on Satisfaction adn Performance: a Test in Egyphtion Agricultural Extension System. Academic Journal, Vol.8 (48) PP. 6126-6130.
16. Ikhsan, D., Artiningsih, D.W. and Wahyuni, N. 2018. Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu, Karakteristik Pekerjaan dan Karakteristik Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai (Studi pada Politeknik Kotabaru). Jurnal Bisnis dan Pembangunan. Volume 7, No. 1
17. Malayu, S.P.H. 2017. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
18. Malhotra, N.K. 1999. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, Third Edition.Upper Saddle. New Jersey : Pientice Hall Inc.
19. Mangkunegara, A.P. 2005. Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
20. Mangkuprawira. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
21. Manullang, M. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
22. Mudiartha, dkk. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Denpasar : Graha Ilmu
23. Munandar A.S. 2003. Psikologi Industri. Jakarta : Universtitas Terbuka.
24. Nawawi, H. 2003. Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
25. Nitisemito, A.S. 2010. Manajemen Personalia. Cetakan Kesembilan, Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta : Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.
26. Panggabean. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
27. Peoni, H. 2014 Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Skripsi. Universitas Sam Ratulangi.
28. Peraturan pemerintah No. 46 Tahun 2011 tentang penilaian prestasi kerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil, mewajibkan setiap pegawai Negeri Sipil menyusun Sasaran Kerja Pegawai (SKP).
29. Prastowo, M. 2011. Pengaruh Karakteristik Pekerjaan Lingkungan Kerja, Struktur Organisasi dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Skripsi. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
30. Puspito, H., Haryono, A.T. & Warso, H. (2016), Pengaruh Motivasi Intrinsik, Motivasi Ekstrinsik dan Pengalaman Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada BTPN syariah Semarang).
31. Rahman, A. 2013. Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu, Motivasi, Budaya Kerja terhadap Kinerja pegawai pada Badan Keluarga Berencana dan Pemberdayaan Perempuan Kabupaten Donggala.
32. Rasyid, A. 1999. Management Sumber Daya Manusia. Menyonsong Abad 21. Edisi 26, Jilid 2. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.
33. Retnasari, H. 2010. Pengaruh Karakteristik Pekerjaan dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan AJB Bumi Putra Kendari. Skripsi, Kendari: Fekon Unhalu.
34. Riduwan 2004. Statistika untuk Lembaga dan Instansi Pemerintah, Swasta, Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta
35. Riduwan, 2003, Dasar-Dasar Statistika, Cetakan Ketiga, Bandung : Alfabeta.
36. Rivai, V. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan, Dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta : Penerbit. PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
37. Robbins, S.P. 2002. Perilaku Organisasi (alih bahasa Drs. Benjamin Molan), Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Klaten : PT Int An Sejati.
38. Robert M. and John J. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba empat
39. Saputri. T.D. 2016. Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu, Karakteristik Pekerjana dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di PT. BRI (Persero) Tbk Cabang Surabaya Kapas Krampung. Skripsi. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Undonesia, Surabaya.
40. Sastrohadisuwiryo. 2010. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia, Edisi 2, Jakarta : PT. Bumi Askara.
41. Schuller, R. and Jackson, S.E. 1999. Human Resource Management, Positioning for The 21 Century, 6th edition.
42. Sedarmayanti, T. 2007. Manejemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jilid 1. Jakarta : PT Gunung. Agung.
43. Siagian, 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara.
44. Simamora, H. 1999. Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia, STIE, YKPN, Yogyakarta.
45. Sofyandi, 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.
46. Subyantoro A. 2009. Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu, Karakteristik Pekerjaan, Karakteristik Organisasi dan Kepuasan Kerja Pengurus yang Dimediasi oleh Motivasi Kerja, Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan Vol.11 No, 1 , P. 11-19.
47. Sujana, I.W., Widnyana, I.W. and Suparsa, I.N., 2017. Peran Auditor Internal Dalam Menentukan Pengaruh Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Good University Governance Di Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar. Jurnal Bakti Saraswati, 6(1), pp.63-72.
48. Sugiyono, 2013. Metodelogi Penelitian Manajemen, Cetakan Pertama. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
49. Wilson, B. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
50. Widnyana, I.W. 2016. Pengaruh Kecukupan Modal, Likuiditas, Risiko Kredit Dan Efisiensi Terhadap Kinerja Bank Bumn Yang Terdaftar Di Bei. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen (JUIMA), 6(1).
51. Widnyana, I.W., Widyawati, S.R. and Warmana, G.O., 2019. Pengaruh Pemberian Mata Kuliah Kewirausahaan dan Pelatihan Wirausaha Terhadap Minat Wirausaha Ekonomi Kreatif Pada Mahasiswa Unmas Denpasar. Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia, 1(1).
52. Widyawati, S.R. and Karwini, N.K., 2019. The Effect of Intelligence Quotient and Emotional Quotient on Employee Performance at Pt. Karna Titian Sejahtera Denpasar. International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review, 10(02), pp.21401-21407.
53. Winardi, 2007. Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Pers da
