Journal of Research & Opinion peer-reviewed open access journal

Why We No-Shave in November: A Fantasy-Theme Criticism

A Fantasy-Theme Criticism

Yerodin Carrington
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:17:"Regent University";}
Share:

How to Cite

1.
Why We No-Shave in November: A Fantasy-Theme Criticism. Journal of Research and Opinion [Internet]. 2020 Feb. 25 [cited 2024 Dec. 3];7(2):2638-42. Available from: https://researchopinion.in/index.php/jro/article/view/50
  • Articles
  • Submited: February 19, 2020
  • Published: February 25, 2020

Abstract

Why We No-Shave in November gives a scholarly rhetorical vision of a trend that occurs for one month, yearly. No-Shave November is a social movement used to support cancer patients through financial, emotional and visual support. A Fantasy-theme criticism and the Symbolic Convergence Theory was applied to this popular fellowship. A historical research was conducted through websites, newspaper articles, and scholarly peer reviews for factual results. However, No-Shave November is an American community exhibiting companionship similar to Austria's Movember and may be responsible for the emergence of the Big Beard Movement. For one month out of a year, participants shave their hair follicles and donate grooming funds to men’s health research projects to illustrate their support for cancer patients undergoing treatment, as the hair follicles grow wild and free.

References

Bormann, E. G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 396–407. doi:10.1080/00335637209383138

Bormann, E. G., Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (2003). Defending symbolic convergence theory from an imaginary Gunn. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89(4), 366–372. doi: 10.1080/0033563032000160990

Care Concerns, S. (n.d.). 7 Tips for Participating in No-Shave November. Retrieved November 28, 2019, from

Diani, M. (1992, February 1). The Concept of Social Movement - Mario Diani, 1992. Retrieved November 28, 2019, from

Foss, S. K. (2018). Rhetorical criticism: exploration and practice (5th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

Hill Foundation, M. (n.d.). No-Shave November. Retrieved November 13, 2019, from .

Kafle, H. R. (2014). Symbolic Convergence Theory: Revisiting its Relevance to Team Communication. International Journal of Communication, 24(1), 16–29.

Lynch, B. (2019, November 3). How to freshen your follicles for No Shave November or Movember. Retrieved November 28, 2019, from .

Mohrmann, G. P. (1982). II. Fantasy theme criticism: A peroration. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68(3), 306–313. doi: 10.1080/00335638209383615

Movember. Retrieved November 3, 2019, from .

Men are dying too young. We can't afford to stay silent. (n.d.). Retrieved November 13, 2019, from .

No Shave November. (n.d.). Retrieved December 1, 2019, from

No Shave November vs. Movember And The Rules To Participate. (2019, June 14). Retrieved November 29, 2019, from

Rhetorical Criticism (Overview). (n.d.). Retrieved December 1, 2019, from .

Shields, D. C., & Preston, C. T. (1985). Fantasy Theme Analysis in Competitive Rhetorical Criticism. National Forensic Journal, 102–115.

Stroud, S. R. (2002). Religion and Hate Fantasy themes within Christian Identity Rhetoric. Florida Communication Journal, 30(1), 34–41.

Symbolic convergence theory. (2019, October 13). Retrieved November 13, 2019, from .
How to Cite
1.
Why We No-Shave in November: A Fantasy-Theme Criticism. Journal of Research and Opinion [Internet]. 2020 Feb. 25 [cited 2024 Dec. 3];7(2):2638-42. Available from: https://researchopinion.in/index.php/jro/article/view/50

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Custom technologies based on your needs

Journal of Research and Opinion  invites original research and review articles not published/submitted for publications anywhere. The journal accepts review articles only if author (s) has included his/her own research work and is an authority in the particular field. Invited or submitted review articles on current medical research developments will also be included. Medical practitioners are encouraged to contribute interesting case reports.

 

  • Manuscript template
  • Make a submission
  • Beta visitors

Why publish with us?

Open Access and Free

Full open-access. No processing & publication fees for authors

Refereed

The journal has rigorous peer-reviews

Indexed

The journal is indexed in DOAJ, SINTA and under review by ERIC