Comparison of Non-Adhesive Hydrocolloid Dressing and Conventional Dressing Methods in Healing Process of Diabetic Ulcers
- Articles
- Submited: January 4, 2022
-
Published: January 8, 2022
Abstract
Background:
Clinically there are two classifications of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), namely type 1 and type 2. Almost 90-95% of cases of DM found are DM type 2. Hyperglycemia in patients with DM can cause atherosclerosis which is thickening of the basalis membrane, and changes in peripheral nerves that lead to occurrence of diabetic ulcers. The method of treating moist diabetic ulcers with hydrocolloid dressing as "moist wound healing" is the method being developed.
Methods:
Pretest and posttest with control group time series design were used in this study involving 40 diabetic ulcer patients selected based on the determined criteria. Furthermore, 20 patients underwent ulcer treatment using hydrocolloid dressing and 20 patients for conventional ulcer treatment. Dressing replacement was carried out every 2 days and the wound area was measured every week on weeks I, II, and III.
Results:
The results of the normality test of data using Saphiro-Wilk showed that the data were normally distributed (α <0.05) so that the General Linear Model test with repeated measurements used and the result of the multivariate tests of differences in wound area between measurement periods I, II, and III differed significantly from p-value = 0.000 (α <0.05). Furthermore, the area of wound based on the therapy given, namely with Hydrocolloid Dressing and Conventional Dressing also showed a significant difference (p value = 0.047).
Conclusion and Recomendation:
There are differences between the two methods of treatment with hydrocolloid dressing and conventional dressing in the wound healing process. Wound care using both hydrocolloid dressing and conventional dressing showed the healing process with indicators of decreased wound area from weeks I, II, and III. The process of reducing wound area linear with the time of treatment which the longer the wound care the better the healing process. Therefore, in deciding to use the wound dressing method on diabetic ulcer, it is necessary to consider cost-effectiveness and further studies on how conventional, relatively inexpensive wound dressing need to be developed.
Article Metrics Graph
References
Agale, S. V. (2013). Chronic Leg Ulcers: Epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, and Management. Ulcers, 1-9
American Diabetes Association.(2017). Standars of Medical care in Diabetes – 2017. Diabetes Care, 37(1).
Arisanty, I. P. (2014). Konsep dasar: Managemen Perawatan Luka. Jakarata EGC
Ariyani, D. S. (2015). Efektivitas elevasi ekstremitas bawah terhadap proses penyembuhan ulkus diabetik di ruang melati I RSUD dr. Moewardi. KOSALA JIK. 3 (1): 1-6
Armstrong et al. (2017). Identification and Management of infection in diabetic foot ulcers. Wound international. p. 2
Benjamin a. Lipsky, anthony r. Berendt, paul b. Cornia, james c. Pile, edgar j. G. Peters, david g. Armstrong., et.al. (2012). infectious diseases society OF america clinical practice guideline FOR THE diagnosis AND treatment OF diabetic foot infections, clinical infectious diseases, 132-147.
Bilous, R. & donelly, R. (2010). Buku pegangan Diabetes Edisi ke 4. E. K. Yudha. (2014). Jakarata: Bumi medika.
Burgos A, Giménez J, Moreno E, Lamberto E, Utrera M, Urraca EM, et al. (2000). Cost, Efficacy, Efficiency and Tolerability of Collagenase Ointment versus Hydrocolloid Occlusive Dressing in the Treatment of Pressure Ulcers. A Comparative, Randomised, Multicentre Study. Clinical Drug Investigation, 19(5):357–365.
Dinh, T. (2011). Global Perspective on Diabetic Foot Ulcerations Rijeka, Croatia: InTech. 66(4).
Doupis J, Veves A. (2008). Classification, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wounds. Vol. 20, pp. 117–126.
Dumville, JC., Despande, S., O’Meara, S. dan Speak, K. (2013). Hydrocolloid dressing for healing diabetic foot ulcers. The Cohrane Collaboration: John Willy and Sons.
Fortuna., S. (2016). Studi penggunaan antibiotika pada pasien diabetes mellitus dengan ulkus gangrene. Skripsi. Surabaya: Departemen Farmasi Klinis, FF UNAIR Surabaya.
Frederick (2003). Perbedaan efek penggunaaan Povidone iodine 10% dengan minyak Zaitun terhadap penyembuhan luka robek (Lacerated wound). Nursing news. 2 (1); 511 – 523.
Handayani, H. T. (2016). Studi meta analisis perawatan luka kaki diabetes dengan modern dressing. The Indonesia journal of health science, 6 (2). 1-11
Hastuti, W., Haji, S., Abdillah, Y. (2017) pengaruh senam diabetes terhadap kadar gula darah pada pasien diabetes mellitus tipe II Di Wilayah puskesmas kedungwuni II kabupaten pekalong. Jurnal SMART keperawatan sekolah tinggi ilmu kesehatan (STIKes) Karya Husada Semarang. 4 (1), 1-8.
Ismail., D, (2009). Penggunaan balutan modern memperbaiki proses penyembuhan luka diabetik. Jurnal kedokteran Brawijaya, 25 (1) 1-5.
International Diabetes Federation., (2013). Diabetes Atlas, Sixth Edition. hal 25.
Julio,W., Ze’ev, F. Mona, B., and Ilana H.B. (2011). Efficacy of Ozone–Oxygen Therapy for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Diabetes Technologies & Therapeutics, Volume 13 (11).
Lala, G., Akher, S., Azhar, F., Fatima, T., Akhtar, N. dan Bhopal, F. (2014). Comparison of hydrocolloid dressing (Duoderm) with Povidone-Iodine Dressings in Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College, 18 (1): 114 – 117.
Mustafa., I. A. H. (2016). Determinan epidemiologi kejadian ulkus kaki diabetic pada penderita diabetes mellitus Di RSUD dr. Chasan Boesoirie dan Diabetes Center Ternate. Tesis. Surabaya: Program Studi Epidemologi, FKM UNAIR Surabaya.
Nontji., W. Hariati, H., Arafat, R. (2015). Teknik perawatan luka modern dan konvensional terhadap kadar intelukin 1 dan interleukin 6 pada pasien luka diabetik. Jurnal Ners. 10 (1) 133-137.
Novriansyah., R. (2008). Perbedaan kepadatan kolagen di sekitar luka insisi tikus wistar yang dibalut kasa konvensional dan penutup oklusi hidrokoloid selama 2 dan 14 hari. Tesis. Semarang: program pendidikan dokter spesialis I ilmu bedah. Program pasca sarjana Magister ilmu biomedik UNDIP Semarang.
PERKENI., (2011). Konsensus Pengendalian dan Pencegahan Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2 di Indonesia. Jakarta, PERKENI.
Pott, FS., Meier, MJ., Slocco, JG., Crozeta, K. dan Ribas, JD. (2014). The effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressing versus other dressings in the healing of pressure ulcers in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta analysis. Revista Latino Americano de Enfermagem, 22 (3): 511 – 520.
Profil Kesehatan Kota Magelang Tahun 2014 tentang status kesehatan kota magelang (2014). Magelang
Semer., N. B. (2013). Dasar-dasar Perawatan luka. (Nugroho., S. W., Trans) Global-HELP Organization.
Septiyanti, M. Hubungan Tingkat Pengetahuan Dengan Sikap Perawat Tentang Perawatan Luka Diabetes Menggunakan Teknik Moist Wound Healing. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan Universitas Riau, 1(1), 1-8.
Smeltzer S. C., Bare, B. G., Hingkle, J. L.,& Cheever, K. H. (2012) Brunner and Suddarth’s textbook of Medical surgical Nursing (9 th Ed). Philadelpia; Lippincott.
Sola, MG., Mieras, AS. dan Tomas-Vidal, AM (2013). A Multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive poluurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II presure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes. BMC-Family Practice, 14: 196.
Sujarweni., W. V. (2014). Metodologi penelitian keperawatan. Yogyakarta: Gava media
Sunaryo., T. Sudiro. (2014). Pengaruh senam diabetik terhadap penurunan risiko ulkus kaki diabetik pada pasien DM tipe 2 DI perkumpulan diabetik. Jurnal Terpadu ilmu kesehatan. 3 (1): 99-105.
World Health Organization. (2016). Global report on diabetes. World Health Organization.
